Wise
decision
IN
YOUR editorial, ‘Successes in Suriname’, on June 18, 2006, you
asserted that the lack of communication between the Guyanese and
Surinamese security forces is disturbing.
While
on the surface that may appear to be so, I would argue that the
Surinamese decision not to share sensitive information with the
Guyanese security forces is certainly a wise one.
Simply
and obviously, the Guyanese security forces are compromised at many
levels and its judiciary lacks the resources to be effective.
At
the very least, Mr. Khan and his cohorts should not be returned to
Guyana if the evidence gathered so far proves to be legally binding.
D. SEMPLE
A
set up?
WAS
Roger Khan’s arrest in neighbouring Suriname a set up?
Looking
back at the sequence of events Mr. Khan is very lucky to be alive.
At least he may still have a chance to tell the other side of the
story and this may be making some senior people in this country very
uncomfortable.
I
am not surprised no Guyanese Embassy official was available in
Suriname to help facilitate a meeting between Khan and his attorney
since this seems be a well-orchestrated event.
Every
country and more so the United States does whatever it takes to
protect the rights of their citizens; however, when it comes to
Guyana, officials stand idly by while our basic human rights are
trampled upon, whether it is in the Caribbean or other countries
around the world.
Isn’t
everyone innocent until proven guilty?
Mr. Khan may have been exposed by the very same person/persons who
advised him to seek refuge in the neighbouring state to avoid
capture in Guyana.
I
will be shocked if this administration makes any real effort to have
Mr. Khan extradited to Guyana to face charges.
This
may be a great move at this time if our neighbours can keep Mr. Khan
there for a long time as they seem bent on doing.
If
not, look out guys -- Uncle Sam loves to make plea deals.
SANJAY SINGH
Try
him in an independent country
I
GUESS there must be a lot of worried people now in Guyana,
especially cronies of this major player.
Roger
Khan should be tried in an independent country and when he loosens
his tongue I feel a very interesting story will emerge.
He
can’t possibly be sent back to a country that can’t even find a
few missing passports and guns, although he may be able to enlighten
us on this subject also.
EXPAT
Watching
closely
WOULD
the Government of Guyana, now that Roger Khan and some of his
associates have been captured, issue a statement about this man?
After
all, according to Khan, he helped in the fight against crime in
Guyana.
Who
is to say that if the
government "abandons"
him, he may
"spill the beans" and name a few names in high places once
he sees that there is no way out for him?
We
Guyanese abroad will be watching this space with bated breath.
GUYANESE ABROAD
Human
rights violation
A
MASSIVE human rights violation and racial discrimination is
taking place in Guyana.
The
People’s National Congress Reform (PNCR) is claiming that thousands
of people of one ethnic background are either dead or
non-existent and therefore their names must be removed from the
voters list.
If
this is not a gross human rights violation and racial
discrimination, then what is?
Silence
is the key word on this issue from the Guyana Human Rights
Organisation (GHRA), the Ethic Relations Commission (ERC) and the
Guyana Bar Association.
These
organisations were formed to inquire and take action if
necessary if human rights are being violated, or if racial
discrimination exists, but they choose to remain silent.
Isn't
disenfranchising a citizen of his/her civic right to
cast a vote for a party of his/her choice a human rights violation?
Isn't
trying to remove one ethnic group from exercising their civic right,
total racial discrimination?
GHRA
and their counterparts are very vocal when some people are
killed by the security forces.
The
PNCR voice their concerns about human rights violations when some
criminals are killed by security forces but want the names of
thousands of people from one ethnic background removed from the
voters list, although they are very much alive and have every right to
vote.
Isn't
this racial discrimination and blatant disregard for human rights?
The
U.S., Canada, UK, EU and the United Nations are urged to look into
these violations.
T. KING
Tuesday,
June 20, 2006
|