Piecing
together the Roger Khan story
LET’S
make some serious sense out of the Roger Khan story.
In 2002
when crime in Guyana was at its peak,
it was very obvious that the Guyana Police Force was in no condition
to battle with the criminals in action at that time.
We
the Guyanese public saw this with our own eyes. Police were being
killed; Police stations were being shot at; the calibre of Police
weapons was poor compared to what the criminals possessed.
There
were wars between the police and the criminals that left the police
defeated. We can never deny this.
Businessmen
were also being targeted and all, even government officials, feared
for their lives in the kidnapping scene that prevailed at that time.
Then
we the Guyanese witnessed gang wars. Some gangs decided that they
were going to challenge the known gunmen -- “The Prison Escapees
and Buxton elements”.
It
was at this period that these criminals started surfacing
“dead”.
The
police claimed to have no clue as to how this occurred and blamed it
on gang wars. After some time Guyanese began breathing easy again as
the dangerous criminals turned up dead.
It
was so obvious that this was done without thanks to the Guyana
Police Force or the GDF who were living in Buxton at the time -- the
same village infested by the criminals they were looking for.
We
all knew of this so much that talk began to surface that there was a
‘Phantom Gang’ that was ridding the society of criminals.
I
honestly feel that this alleged ‘Phantom Gang’ indeed helped
Guyana in reducing crime and it was formed because the crime
fighting units of our country could not protect businessmen and
others in the society.
I
also believe that without Roger Khan’s help at this time, the
government would not have remained in office. I say so
because it was evident to the public that criminal elements were
affiliated to the PNCR which was striving to make this country
ungovernable.
It
was the PNCR and its supporters who took the streets, picketed, lit
fires, beat and harassed bystanders, looted stores, and you know the
rest.
But
the PPP/C denial of Roger Khan is not surprising.
Now
let’s talk about the U.S. Embassy affiliation with Roger Khan. All
along we have had denials of all these agencies having meetings with
Mr. Khan.
The
U.S. openly denied any ties with Roger Khan. Yet when rumours
surfaced that Khan may have tapes of these meetings, these same
agencies in denial came forth with a different story.
The
GDF admitted to its meeting Khan and only now the U.S. embassy is
saying Khan indeed met the Americans -- only that it was the DEA and
the FBI that have close ties to the embassy.
Only
now when proof is beginning to surface that these meetings did occur
that all guilty are jumping to alter their denials.
Questions
that arise:
1. Is Roger Khan a threat now to
the government?
2.
How do we think the government will deal with any threats related to
it at this election period?
3.
Are the Americans really involved with the PNCR to remove allies
(Roger Khan) who make it difficult for them to make our country
ungovernable?
4.
Where is the evidence that implicates Roger Khan to drugs in
America?
Those of us who are aware of our country’s history would know that
the National Security Act was introduced in the Burnham period when
he wanted to control the Rupununi revolt. Because of this Act, up to
today we the public never knew what really happened during this
revolt as the Act restricted the movements of persons in and out of
the Rupununi.
Pastors
and human rights persons who ventured into the area were arrested on
arrival and flown out of the area. Under this Act the Police and
Army are given the rights to search, seize and arrest at will.
Where
are our human right activists now?
I
believe the stories of Roger Khan relating to his affiliation to the
government, the GDF, GPF and the American Embassy.
What has he to gain from lying about his?
S. ALLI
May 24th, 2006